“A well designed Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) regarding acute WAD, demonstrated recently that 6 sessions of multimodal physiotherapy (advice, exercise, manual therapy) were slightly more effective, but not on a significant level, than just one physiotherapy session that focused mainly on offering advice (Lamb et al., 2013).
In concordance with the previous findings, Michaleff et al., (2014) in a pragmatic RCT found that a 30-minute educational session containing a package of consultation, informational booklets and simple advice can be as efficient as a 12 week exercise program delivered by physiotherapists, including manual therapy, CBT, posture education and sensorimotor training. The authors emphasised the impact these findings can have on the current cost of WAD treatment as they could potentially decrease the number of unnecessary visits to healthcare practitioners”
Thanks to my friend Vasil for these papers
Bloody hell! It is the first thing I thought when I read it. Basically it is saying that education & advice are as important as the treatment.
Unfortunately there are a lot of practicioners who spend thousand of pound in courses, medical instruments and electro-medicals and loose the contact with the most important part of our job, the foundation of our profession: EDUCATION AND ADVICE.
What do I mean?
I mean trying to understand patient’s beliefs (regarding the issue) and expectations (regarding the rehabilitation) and to use them in order to get a successfull outcome.
As Prof. Lorimer Moseley said: “Anything that changes your brain’s evaluation of danger will change the pain”. Most of the patients come to the initial assessment very scared and worried, especially after road traffic accident. Few days ago a client of mine told me: “I cannot believe I can feel so much pain at this age: I damaged something”.
After a proper initial assessment, after you realise there is nothing major, the first thing you must do is to calm down the client, explain that pain is not synonym of damage, that is influenced by several factors that are not strictly body related (especially after a road traffic accident) etc…
Middle age people are very concerned about the MRI and XRAY findings. Expressions like “degenerated spine”, “degenerated discs”, “bulging”, “osteoarthritis” , “sprained ligaments” etc.. are all expressions that poison the mind of the client making him think that there is a certain connection between the physical damage and the pain he/she is experiencing.
“So if my spine is degenerated how can I get better? Am I doomed to pain for the rest of my life?” that is what lot of people ask me at the initial assessment.
Until you don’t change these beliefs there is no way to make him/her feeling better.
That is why, as my friend Giancarlo Russo says, if you approach the client in the right way and if you communicate properly 90% of the job is already done; what you do on the treatment couch is not so important anymore.
However, there cases in which it is impossible to change people’s belief. If you treat a 70 years old client with pain on the left sacro-iliac joint is very difficult for that person to accept the idea that the site of the pain is not where the problem is. It is difficult for that person to accept the idea that if you treat the thoracic spine and the diaphragm the pain will calm down. In this case if you don’t manage to change his/her beliefs you have to be smart and to use them to fix the problem.
A 10 minutes massage on the painful area will be enough to make the client happy and to get “potential” on him/her (we will explain this topic in another post) and you will still have time enough to do all the techniques that you believe are necessary.
Treatment is very important but it becomes meaningless without the initial interview. On the other side a profitable interview could be not enough without a proper treatment.
I don’t really know what a “proper treatment” is, I can just tell you that, with the right advice and education even a normal massage could be enough to fix a non-specific-low-back pain or a non-specific-neck pain.
You can spend thousand of euro, quid or bucks in courses with pretentious and exotic names but, if you are not able to deal with people, to approach them properly and to give the right advice you will not go any further: you will always be a mediocre therapist.
Thanks to my colleague Adam Meakins to let me share his beautiful picture: the physio treatment pyramid
Thanks for reading
Davide
Hey! Great post. I am presenting an inservice on pain neuroscience education and I would like to include the Physio Pyramid in my presentation. Would that be okay?
LikeLike
Yes of course!!
LikeLike
Im doing the same for American Athletic Trainers Society. Would love to use the pyramid. Additionally, I lecture for a company called RockTape. We use tape and tools to cause descending inhibition and symptom modulation. Would love to sue the slide in our deck.
LikeLike
Hello! The picture is not mine but property of adam meakins. You havento ask him but I am sure there are no problem;)
LikeLike
Do you need the article or just the picture?
LikeLike
Problem 1: physician (installing poor belief patterns and not letting the patient recieve timely therapy before the pain reaches chronic levels.
Problem 2: actual neurological progressive damage which does exist it’s not all in the brain. (I.E. Radiculopathy due to severe herniated disc. )
Problem 3: can we ignore biomechanics altogether and not suffer the consequences.
Problem 4: this advice is only helpful for normal non specific low back pain. However, pain cannot be ignored because the nature of pain can alter the diagnoses I.e pain unchanged by position or sleep.
LikeLike
Problem 1: I totally agree with you
Problem 2: No actual correlation between herniated disc and radiculopathy. Nerve compression doesn’t give sciatica.
Problem 3: Yes, we can sometimes ignore biomechanic
Problem 4: pain, in any of its aspects, doesn’t have to be ignored. This advice are helpful for any kind of pain; more for nonspecific lbp but this advice works for any type of pain.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for an excellent article. I’m looking forward to more in the future!
Re problem 2: I find myself thinking about this aspect of pain science also, as a practitioner (LMT) who is slowly learning how to speak with their clients and educate them about this. Isn’t it the case that we have to be careful not to 100% discount the ‘bio’ part of BPS model when doing an intake with a client, especially one who has not seen a doctor yet? I understand that a herniated disc may not cause pain at all. And also that educating them will help to reduce pain no matter the cause by helping to initiate descending inhibition. However, sometimes pain is genuinely pointing to a biological problem that needs medical attention, no?
LikeLike
Indeed:) acute pain especially may points to a biological problem that needs medical attentions. I never said the opposite;) the first thing you have to do once you approach your client is to make sure there are no red flags or major problems that require further investigation…
LikeLike
Brilliant post! Would you mind if I used this as a slide in one of my Presentations? Obviously I am more than happy to credit you.
Adam
LikeLike
Hello! The picture is not mine but property of adam meakins. You havento ask him but I am sure there are no problem;)
LikeLike
Thank you 😊
LikeLike